drift
dadbodgeoff · dadbodgeoff/drift
Một MCP server và CLI giúp các tác nhân AI thực thi các quy ước mã và phát hiện các mẫu trong codebase qua các phiên làm việc, chạy cục bộ.
Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server for any IDE. Offline CLI.
Xem trước
Bạn có thể làm gì với nó
- Đảm bảo mã do AI tạo ra tuân thủ các phong cách lập trình hiện có của dự án.
- Ngăn chặn các tác nhân AI đưa vào mã vi phạm các quy ước đã thiết lập.
- Tự động xác định và gắn cờ các thay đổi mã không tuân thủ do AI thực hiện.
Kiểm tra an toàn
Không thấy dấu hiệu rủi ro trong các file đã quét.
Quét tự động các file trong repo. Luôn xem lại code trước khi chạy.
Trích từ README
Drift
Drift stops an AI agent from writing code that violates conventions your repo already follows. It runs entirely on your machine.
Beta install: build from source. Nothing is published to npm yet —
npm install -g @drift/clidoes not work, and thedriftdetectpackage on npm is the unrelated v1 from January. Building needs a Rust toolchain (rustup) because the scan engine is Rust.
git clone https://github.com/dadbodgeoff/drift.git && cd drift
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm build && pnpm build:engine
# There is no `drift` binary yet; the entry point is the built CLI.
alias drift="node $PWD/packages/cli/dist/main.js"
drift doctor --repo-root . # fails loudly if the toolchain is missing
Then, in the repository you want to protect:
cd your-repo
drift start --repo-root . --accept-defaults
start prints whether the convention it accepted will actually block, and the command to make it a
gate if it will not. Now have an agent add a route that queries the database directly, the way a
hundred other routes in your repo do not, and check the change:
drift check --diff HEAD~1...HEAD --scope changed-hunks
It names the file, the line, and the convention that was broken. In block mode it exits 2.
--diff main...HEADonly works once your branch has commits thatmaindoes not. On a freshly cloned repo you are onmain, so that range is empty and Drift refuses rather than reporting a pass it cannot support — exit3. That refusal is correct; give it a range with changes in it.
Scope — read this before adopting
Drift enforces one convention family well, and says so rather than implying more:
| Languages | TypeScript, JavaScript |
| Frameworks | Next.js API routes (App Router and Pages) |
| Convention | API routes must not import data-access clients directly |
| Status | Beta — local CLI and a read-only MCP server |
It does not review code generally, support other languages, modify your source, or sync anything to a server.
The data layer is recognised when its import specifier contains prisma, database, db or
data-access. A repo naming its data layer store or supabase must declare it with
--data-modules. Drift bootstraps and enforces a declared layering contract — it does not
learn conventions in general, and the claims manifest blocks that claim explicitly.
Security heuristics exist behind --experimental-security and are not proofs. Their own audit
is in docs/internal/architecture/security-heuristic-audit.md.
What it does on real repositories
Evaluated on seven open-source Next.js repos on every change
(pnpm eval:external):
| Onboards, learns the real data layer, catches an injected violation | 7 / 7 |
Correct file:line evidence | 7 / 7 |
| A properly layered route falsely flagged | 0 / 7 |
| False-positive rate (dub, 494 routes) | 3.1% |
Evasion shapes caught, at the contract's mode (pnpm eval:evasion) | 66 / 66 testable cells |
And, because the number that decides whether a first session is tolerable is not recall but how often
Drift declines to answer — eight ordinary edits per repo, none of them a violation
(pnpm eval:bench):
| Ordinary edits refused rather than answered | 0 / 56 |
| Local imports the resolver places | 96.1% – 99.9% |
Every check reports its own coverage, so a clean result is never mistaken for full coverage. Where
Drift cannot resolve something it says so, with the offending specifiers — see
drift doctor and summary.import_coverage.
Why your repo might only warn
If findings appear but the check exits 0, the convention is in warn mode, deliberately.
Drift infers the convention from the violations themselves, so a repo where every route touches the database produces the same statement as one where a single route does. Enforcing both identically would reject new code written exactly like its neighbours. Instead the mode follows the evidence: a minority violating means new violations block; a majority violating means it is a refactor goal, and Drift warns until a human decides.
formbricks (1 route of 83) blocks. dub (~323 of 494) warns.
Documentation
- Quickstart — install to first blocked change
- Concepts — facts → contract → baseline → check
- Agent integration — MCP, hooks, CI
- Enforcement reference — exit codes and JSON contract
- Claims — every claim, and what is deliberately blocked
- History — why Drift has been rebuilt three times, and what changed each time
First Five Minutes
From the repo you want Drift to inspect:
drift doctor --repo-root .
drift start --repo-root . --accept-defaults
drift doctor --repo-root .
The first doctor run is a zero-write readiness check. After start, run it again as the ongoing local health gate: it validates SQLite migration compatibility, repo registration, contract compatibility, scan freshness, audit-chain integrity, and tracked backup artifacts, then prints the next upkeep commands.
start --accept-defaults is explicit onboarding confirmation. It accepts the deterministic default convention, materializes the repo contract, and baselines existing findings so legacy drift does not block the first check. Omit --accept-defaults when you want to review every candidate manually first.
drift start prints the local SQLite path:
export DRIFT_DB=/path/to/drift.sqlite
Then use the printed repo id with the review loop:
drift baseline status --repo <repo_id>
drift vers