Airsc is free for everyone. If it helps you, support it with $2–$20.

Support
MCP serverSafeCode review & qualityAdvanced

drift

dadbodgeoff · dadbodgeoff/drift

An MCP server and CLI that helps AI agents enforce code conventions and detect patterns in a codebase across sessions, running locally.

Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server for any IDE. Offline CLI.

790 stars65License: MITUpdated last month0 opens

Preview

▍

What you can do with it

  • Ensure AI-generated code adheres to existing project coding styles.
  • Prevent AI agents from introducing code that violates established conventions.
  • Automatically identify and flag non-compliant code changes made by an AI.

Safety check

Safe

No risky patterns found in the files we scanned.

Automated scan of the repo files. Always review code you run.

From the README

Drift

Drift stops an AI agent from writing code that violates conventions your repo already follows. It runs entirely on your machine.

Beta install: build from source. Nothing is published to npm yet — npm install -g @drift/cli does not work, and the driftdetect package on npm is the unrelated v1 from January. Building needs a Rust toolchain (rustup) because the scan engine is Rust.

git clone https://github.com/dadbodgeoff/drift.git && cd drift
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm build && pnpm build:engine

# There is no `drift` binary yet; the entry point is the built CLI.
alias drift="node $PWD/packages/cli/dist/main.js"
drift doctor --repo-root .          # fails loudly if the toolchain is missing

Then, in the repository you want to protect:

cd your-repo
drift start --repo-root . --accept-defaults

start prints whether the convention it accepted will actually block, and the command to make it a gate if it will not. Now have an agent add a route that queries the database directly, the way a hundred other routes in your repo do not, and check the change:

drift check --diff HEAD~1...HEAD --scope changed-hunks

It names the file, the line, and the convention that was broken. In block mode it exits 2.

--diff main...HEAD only works once your branch has commits that main does not. On a freshly cloned repo you are on main, so that range is empty and Drift refuses rather than reporting a pass it cannot support — exit 3. That refusal is correct; give it a range with changes in it.

Scope — read this before adopting

Drift enforces one convention family well, and says so rather than implying more:

LanguagesTypeScript, JavaScript
FrameworksNext.js API routes (App Router and Pages)
ConventionAPI routes must not import data-access clients directly
StatusBeta — local CLI and a read-only MCP server

It does not review code generally, support other languages, modify your source, or sync anything to a server.

The data layer is recognised when its import specifier contains prisma, database, db or data-access. A repo naming its data layer store or supabase must declare it with --data-modules. Drift bootstraps and enforces a declared layering contract — it does not learn conventions in general, and the claims manifest blocks that claim explicitly.

Security heuristics exist behind --experimental-security and are not proofs. Their own audit is in docs/internal/architecture/security-heuristic-audit.md.

What it does on real repositories

Evaluated on seven open-source Next.js repos on every change (pnpm eval:external):

Onboards, learns the real data layer, catches an injected violation7 / 7
Correct file:line evidence7 / 7
A properly layered route falsely flagged0 / 7
False-positive rate (dub, 494 routes)3.1%
Evasion shapes caught, at the contract's mode (pnpm eval:evasion)66 / 66 testable cells

And, because the number that decides whether a first session is tolerable is not recall but how often Drift declines to answer — eight ordinary edits per repo, none of them a violation (pnpm eval:bench):

Ordinary edits refused rather than answered0 / 56
Local imports the resolver places96.1% – 99.9%

Every check reports its own coverage, so a clean result is never mistaken for full coverage. Where Drift cannot resolve something it says so, with the offending specifiers — see drift doctor and summary.import_coverage.

Why your repo might only warn

If findings appear but the check exits 0, the convention is in warn mode, deliberately.

Drift infers the convention from the violations themselves, so a repo where every route touches the database produces the same statement as one where a single route does. Enforcing both identically would reject new code written exactly like its neighbours. Instead the mode follows the evidence: a minority violating means new violations block; a majority violating means it is a refactor goal, and Drift warns until a human decides.

formbricks (1 route of 83) blocks. dub (~323 of 494) warns.

Documentation

First Five Minutes

From the repo you want Drift to inspect:

drift doctor --repo-root .
drift start --repo-root . --accept-defaults
drift doctor --repo-root .

The first doctor run is a zero-write readiness check. After start, run it again as the ongoing local health gate: it validates SQLite migration compatibility, repo registration, contract compatibility, scan freshness, audit-chain integrity, and tracked backup artifacts, then prints the next upkeep commands.

start --accept-defaults is explicit onboarding confirmation. It accepts the deterministic default convention, materializes the repo contract, and baselines existing findings so legacy drift does not block the first check. Omit --accept-defaults when you want to review every candidate manually first.

drift start prints the local SQLite path:

export DRIFT_DB=/path/to/drift.sqlite

Then use the printed repo id with the review loop:

drift baseline status --repo <repo_id>
drift vers
View source on GitHub